USSYP Interviews 2026 | Essay Portion
Essay Questions USSYP
November 2026
Your answer to ONE of the following essay questions will help our committee better understand your interest and aptitude in government, history, and politics as part of the United States Senate Youth Scholarship Program selection process.
Please choose a prompt and write an essay of 300 words or less that explores ONE of the following issues as fully as possible.
At the top of your essay:
Write your name
Underneath your name, type “I affirm” to acknowledge this statement regarding the use of AI in writing your essay (see below).
Finally, copy and paste the essay you chose.
I affirm that all work submitted as part of the 2026-2027 USSYP application that is not cited to its original author/creator is entirely my own original effort, free from plagiarism. I have not used artificial intelligence (AI) in the creation of any written, visual, or creative components of this submission or received unauthorized assistance not otherwise permitted as an approved reasonable accommodation for a disability. I understand that failure to comply may result in the cancellation of my application.
QUESTIONS:
Should Supreme Court justices have term limits? What arguments support and oppose changing lifetime appointments?
When state and federal governments disagree on a major policy issue, which should prevail? Explain what the Constitution suggests about the proper balance of power.
What is the greater threat to American democracy: political polarization or political disengagement? Defend your answer and explain what government and citizens can do about it.
Should Congress regulate artificial intelligence before its effects are fully understood? What should determine the balance between innovation and government oversight?
Should presidents have the authority to impose broad tariffs without congressional approval? What does the separation of powers suggest?
When, if ever, should colleges and universities be permitted to restrict speech that students consider threatening or harmful? How should free speech rights be balanced against campus safety and inclusion?